Banks Do Not Owe A General Duty Of Care To A Customer To Prevent “Insider Abuse”
TD bank successfully defended an action brought against it by a customer in a Ponzi scheme case in McDonald and Dickson v. TD Bank, 2021 ONSC 3872. The result came after a 43 day trial before Justice Conway in Toronto on the Commercial List. This case is important in setting out the scope of a bank’s obligations to a client who has been defrauded by an insider of the client. SIB was an offshore bank operating in Antigua. It was solely owned by Allen Stanford. TD was the primary domestic correspondent bank for SIB for 18 years, offering on-shore US ... [more] Full article
Superior Court Certifies $1.0 Billion Foreign Exchange Price Fixing Class Action
In his decision released earlier this Spring, Ontario Superior Court Justice Paul Perell certified a class action in Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada claiming $1.0 Billion in damages against ... [more] Full article
Privacy law does not shield judgment debtors
The recent Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Trang has provided important guidance on how Canada’s federal privacy legislation, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act ... [more] Full article
After the Storm: only CIBC and IMAX class actions survive
In Ontario, the last four years have been overcast for securities class actions. The clouds lifted last week, when the Supreme Court clarified a critical limitation period by overturning the ... [more] Full article