Copycat class actions criticized
Courts have begun to criticize plaintiff lawyers who file multiple overlapping class actions across the country. In Ontario, Perell J. refused to approve an agreement by two BC firms to share their fee with a Saskatchewan-based firm, Merchant Law Group (“MLG”) in Bancroft-Snell v. Visa Canada Corporation. More than one year after the BC firms had filed class actions in Ontario and BC alleging conspiracies in relation to credit card interchange fees, MLG started copycat actions in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The BC firms agreed to pay a share of their fee to MLG in return for MLG agreeing to stay ... [more] Full article
After the Storm: only CIBC and IMAX class actions survive
In Ontario, the last four years have been overcast for securities class actions. The clouds lifted last week, when the Supreme Court clarified a critical limitation period by overturning the ... [more] Full article
Ontario’s top court affirms denial of leave to amend claim in secondary market misrepresentation class action
The requirement for leave of the court in order to proceed with secondary market claims under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act continues to evolve and be the subject of extensive judicial commentary almost ten years after it came into force. [more] Full article
Credit cards subject to provincial disclosure laws
The perennial question in Canadian law (and politics) is: is it federal or provincial? In the case of credit cards issued by banks, the answer is "both". Although banks are a federal responsibility, provincial consumer protection laws mandating disclosure of contract terms apply to banks that issue credit cards, the Supreme Court held recently in three decisions issued the same day. [more] Full article