Ontario’s Top Court upholds decision significantly limiting proposed securities class action against Barrick Gold
In its decision last week in Drywall Acoustic Lathing and Insulation (Pension Fund, Local 675) v. Barrick Gold Corporation, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has upheld the decision of Superior Court Justice Jasmine Akbarali to refuse to grant leave to proceed under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act for a proposed misrepresentation class action against mining giant Barrick Gold Corporation. On the original motion, leave to proceed had been denied in relation to a number of alleged misrepresentations Barrick made in its public filings and it had been granted only in relation to two alleged misrepresentations issued in February ... [more] Full article
Ontario’s top court defines “material change” in securities litigation
In a pair of companion decisions released on May 24, 2023 (Markowich v. Lundin Mining and Peters v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.) the Court of Appeal for Ontario respectively overturned and ... [more] Full article
Ontario’s top court overturns decision refusing leave to proceed with misrepresentation claim against mining company
In a decision released on May 24, 2023 in Markowich v. Lundin Mining, the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturned a Superior Court of Justice decision refusing leave to proceed ... [more] Full article
SCC agrees to hear appeal on whether Securities Commission penalties can survive bankruptcy
On March 31, 2023, Canada’s top court granted leave to appeal from the B.C. Court of Appeal’s decision in Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission) that a securities commission administrative ... [more] Full article
- Court of Appeal Confirms No Duty to Disclose Beneficiary Changes
- Superior Court refuses leave to securities class action based on the difference between “Material Facts” and “Material Changes”
- Ontario’s top court reinstates securities class action against Cannabis company
- Fiduciary Duty for advisors not created by “Best Interest” standard alone